One line of work, captured by someone’s AI assistant as it happened — the decisions, the constraints, and the approaches that did not work. You can read all of it, and fork it to carry on in your own account.
What is Contextaco?What the international reporting standard for systematic reviews demands, read as a specification for what a review has to have been carrying all along — against PRISMA 2020 (Page et al., BMJ 2021;372:n71).
PRISMA is 27 items across seven sections, and it is a reporting guideline, not a method: it says what must appear in the write-up, not how to run the review. Read backwards, that makes it unusually useful — a list of things you must be able to state at the end is a list of things you had to record at the time. You cannot report what you never wrote down.
Three of its requirements do most of the work, and each is sharper than the advice that usually replaces it:
The slots below are the reusable part. Fork this as a recipe (taco_fork with content="recipe") to get them with none of this text.
Standing instruction for anyone working in a fork of this: a finding note names its sources and how many independent studies they represent. Five papers from one lab is one result.